Intel fails to convince judge to overturn $2.18B damages over CPU patent infringements | PC Gamer - hestermartenow
Intel fails to convince judge to overturn $2.18B damages over CPU evident infringements
Intel still owes $2.18 billion in damages to VLSI Applied science LLC aft failing to compel a District Judge in Waco, Texas to overturn a previous finding of fact and issue a new test. Fortunately for Intel, it can give such a monumental payment, though it could potentially get on the solicit for five multiplication Eastern Samoa such, depending on how other legal battles go.
At the root of the kerfuffle are patent infringement claims brought forth by VLSI, aft forthcoming into possession of various technology IP that were previously owned by NXP Semiconductors, a Dutch chipmaking company spun out of Philips in 2006. VLSI, an affiliate of Fortress Investment funds Group, does not actually make or sell or any products, just does own some apparently moneymaking patents.
As detailed by Bloomberg, the two patents resulting in a $2.18 billion damages prize have changed hands several multiplication complete the geezerhood. They were originally held by SigmaTel Iraqi National Congress., which was nonheritable by Freescale Semiconductor Inc. in 2008. Then seven years by and by, NXP bought FreeScale. NXP is not part of the wave of lawsuits, but is pose to receive a portion of any damages VLSI is fit to collect.
IT's confusing chain of events, but it goes something like this: Philips nonheritable VLSI in 1999. Freescale bought Sigmatel in 2008. NXP spun out of Philips in 2006. Freescale unified with NXP in 2015. VLSI spun out of NXP at some point, with key patents in hand, tracing all the way back to Freescale and Sigmatel.
In this case, the two patents—numbers 7,523,373 and 7,725,559—take to answer with technologies aimed at increasing the speed and mightiness of processors, which Intel calls Speeding Shift applied science.
Back in Apr, a judge sided with VLSI, awarding it $1.5 one million million for one of the patents and $675 million for the other. And forthwith that judgement has been upheld, reported to Reuters.
Intel plans to appeal. It points down that this qualifies as the second-largest patent of invention verdict by a jury, and that the incoming three largest ones have all been dismissed on solicitation.
The chipmaker also previously aforesaid these cases brought on by VLSI highlight a need for legislation "to prevent such 'judicial proceeding investors' and their shell companies from using low-quality purchased patents to extract exorbitant damages from productive American businesses."
There is some good news for Intel. It could have owed VLSI some other $3.1 billion concluded a few other patents, but it won that case in April of this year. Barring an appeal, of course.
VLSI has filed terzetto separate lawsuits against Intel. In a preceding filing with the Secant, Intel revealed VLSI's damages claims could embody "as malodorous as $7.1 billion." And if adding in potential ongoing royalties, attorneys' fees, and other costs, the complete bill could exceed $11 one million million.
Up to now, Intel is 'only' obligated to pay $2.18 billion, pending an entreaty. That is still a massive amount, albeit little than half equally much Intel profited in its most Recent fourth part ($5.1 billion, on revenue of $19.6 billion).
Paul has been playing PC games and raking his knuckles connected computer hardware since the Commodore 64. He does not accept any tattoos, merely thinks it would be cool to generate one that reads LOAD"*",8,1. In his off time, he rides motorcycles and wrestles alligators (only one of those is true).
Source: https://www.pcgamer.com/intel-fails-to-convince-judge-to-overturn-dollar218b-damages-over-cpu-patent-infringements/
Posted by: hestermartenow.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Intel fails to convince judge to overturn $2.18B damages over CPU patent infringements | PC Gamer - hestermartenow"
Post a Comment